The “Blossom” House

IMG_2248

The Blossom house has been found!  I can’t tell you how long I’ve been wanting to write that sentence!  Fans of the show are likely looking at the photo above, though, thinking ‘That doesn’t look anything like the Blossom house.’  And they’re right.  Sadly, the pad has been remodeled past recognition.  So how the heck did I identify it as the home where spunky teen Blossom Russo (Mayim Bialik) lived with her father, Nick (Ted Wass), and brothers, Joey (Joey Lawrence) and Anthony (Michael Stoyanov), on the popular NBC series, which ran from 1991 to 1995?  I have fellow stalker Chris (whom you may remember from the posts here, here and here) to thank for that.  Somehow, with no address number or background clues to guide him, he was able to pinpoint the property above, located at 3941 Ethel Avenue in Studio City, as the Russo residence with about 99% certainty!  I then enlisted my friend Michael (guest-poster extraordinaire) to join the endeavor and we were able to eradicate the remaining 1% doubt.  Read on for the story behind our hunt.

[ad]

I began my search for the Russo residence a good three years ago.  Along the way, I brought some fellow stalkers in on the quest, but none of us were successful.  Our failure wasn’t all that surprising considering Blossom aired almost three decades prior and the only clue we really had to go on was the fact that the home was situated on a street with no sidewalk or curb.  Then in mid-May, after Chris identified the Victorian from Hangin’ with Mr. Cooper, I asked if he might help in the pursuit and he was all too happy to do so!  It was not long after that he wrote back with the 3941 Ethel address!  Flabbergasted, I inquired how in the heck he had IDed it so quickly.  He explained, “I found the Blossom house just by browsing around Studio City on Street View and making a list of potential streets/houses, with the intention of then looking at them in more depth later on using the historic aerials on Google Earth.  I found a lot of roads in Studio City seemed to have no sidewalks, so I always thought it was the most likely place.  Eventually, I came to Ethel Avenue and spotted this house, however initially it was more the background, lack of sidewalk and white fence that looked similar rather than the house itself, so I made a note of it and carried on.  I then went into the next street, Mary Ellen Avenue, and it was this street that made me convinced I was in the right area as many of the houses had similar features – in particular, 3942 Mary Ellen Avenue, which had the same style fence, same shaped pathway and lantern as the Blossom house.  For a while, I was convinced that it was somewhere on this road, but after being unable to match any of the houses, I went back to Ethel Avenue.  Immediately after doing so, I noticed the roof of the house next door to 3941 had a similar shape to the one next door to the Blossom house and from that point on, started to notice more and more features that matched.”  The neighboring roofline Chris mentioned is denoted with fuchsia arrows below.  As you can see, its unique shape, as well as the placement and style of the chimney are direct matches to what appeared on Blossom.

screenshot-001463

IMG_2241

Chris went on to explain, “I then learned that 3941 had been renovated in 1996 and after looking at building permits for the property, I found a sketch of the original house that also matched the shape of the Blossom house.”  Chris was kind enough to outline the shape of the original dwelling in red on the drawing, which paints a pretty clear matching picture.  As you’ll notice, the placement of the bay window, wings that jut out on either side, and indented front door outlined in the sketch all mirror those of the Russo residence.

screenshot-001437

screenshot-001462

He also noted that 3941 boasts a hedgerow and spider plants along the right side of the driveway, both of which were evident in Blossom establishing shots.

screenshot-001464 -2

screenshot-001467-2

  I was in awe at Chris’ findings!  Talk about some elite-level detective work! Everything I saw gave me a strong feeling that he had correctly identified the right place.  But you know me – I like to be 100% certain in my reporting.  So I brought in Michael, who uncovered a slew of additional matching details.  His email to me included the aerial below.  As he noted, “The clincher for me is in looking at the blurry Historic Aerial from 1980 you can make out some important features that all match up with Blossom: uniquely angled front walk, bay window sticking out, two tiny dormers, and left roofline that stops short where it turns into a hipped roof.”  It was all compelling evidence, but seeing that angled walkway gave me chills!  I knew we most likely had the right spot!  But still, we pressed on.

screenshot-001447

Blossom_House_1980 -2

Michael furthered, “Also, on the Blossom cap there are crawlspace vents along the foundation of the house.  You can more easily make out one of them on the right corner, and there’s another one slightly visible behind the shrubs centered with the window.  The Blossom siding stopped even with the landing of the front entry.  The current siding goes one slat lower (overlapping the vents).  If you draw a line across them from the front landing, the vents are located in the right spots and at the right level.” Michael even provided the fabulous graphic below to illustrate the point.

Screen Shot 2020-06-04 at 9.59.40 PM (1)

As if that wasn’t enough, Michael zeroed in on the front yard, as well.  He said, “The yard seems to slope down to the right.  In the Blossom cap, taller plantings seem to be covering higher foundation on the right side of the house, compared to the left side.  This is also true for the Ethel Ave location.”  And he noted, “On the Blossom cap taken from the left of the house, you can see the corner of something boxy to the right of the gable on the right side of the house.  I think this might be the brick chimney of the right-side neighbor.”  Though that chimney is blocked from view a bit by 3941’s new roofline and portico, it is still partially visible looking much like what appeared onscreen.

screenshot-001449 -2

IMG_2233-2

Here’s a closer view.

IMG_2238-2

I also spotted a trench running along the street in front of the Russo residence, an element that exists in front of 3941 Ethel, as well.

screenshot-001448 -2

IMG_2234 -2

That 1% doubt still lingered in my mind, though.  I know, I know.  I can be relentless!  But, thankfully, certainty soon hit.  A couple of weeks later, a fellow stalker posted some screen captures of the Russo house from a Blossom DVD in a Facebook group.  The imagery was much clearer than what was being streamed on Amazon Prime, so I promptly ordered a DVD set for myself and waited not-so-patiently for it to arrive.  As soon as it did, I got my clarity!  In the commentary featured on the pilot episode, Blossom creator Don Reo announced that the Russo residence was located in Studio City in real life.  And in the shot below, the house number is pretty clear (even more so when watching on a TV).  It definitely looks like “3941” to me!

screenshot-001466-2

IMG_2242

The clearer caps also led Michael to notice the double-hung window situated on the right side of the Blossom house.  He said, “There’s a window in that exact spot in your present-day photos.  Also behind the trees past the gate on the caps you can sort of make out a straight vertical line.  I think that’s a second window—which is also still in that location.”

screenshot-001440-2

IMG_2241-2

But what really clinched things for me was the establishing shot below in which I spotted a stacked stone fence post attached to the property to the left of the Russo pad.  Google Street View imagery shows that very post next to 3941 (denoted with fuchsia arrows in both pictures below), though it is not visible in any of my photos due to foliage that now stands in front of it.  Not only that, but I saw that the edge of the neighboring house in the Blossom cap was covered in the same stacked stone.  That is also true of the property next to 3941 (denoted with blue arrows below)!  And there’s more!  I also noticed a white fence attached to the left side of the Blossom house.  3941 has that same white fence (marked by purple arrows below)!  All of this adds up to tell me that 3941 Ethel Avenue is, indeed, the Russo residence from Blossom!  Eureka!  Thank you, Chris and Michael!

screenshot-001450 -2

screenshot-001465-2

The timing of the 1996 remodel also adds up being that Blossom went off the air in ‘95.  Seems like the owners, who purchased the place in 1987, waited until the series ended before altering the house, which makes sense.  They likely didn’t want to risk losing out on any possible filming revenue.  Per the building permits, the remodel included a “2,130-square-foot addition” that added on a second level, expanded the first story, and included a new “irregular-shaped porte-cochère.”  All of that gibes with the differences we see of the house as it appeared on Blossom compared to how it looks now.  Post remodel, the dwelling, which was originally built in 1948, boasts 5 bedrooms, 5 baths, and 5,057 square feet.   The decades-old renovation, completed so shortly after the show went off the air and long before internet-sleuthing was a thing, explains why the Russo home has not been identified until now.

screenshot-001466

IMG_2239

Only the exterior of 3941 Ethel Avenue appeared on the series.  The interior of the Russo pad was just a set built on a soundstage, first at Ren-Mar Studios Hollywood (now Red Studios Hollywood), then Sunset Gower Studios, then Fox Television Center (now Helen Bernstein High School).  The production moved around quite a bit during its five-year tenure on the air.

screenshot-001439

screenshot-001441

As Michael pointed out, the Russos’ kitchen has a very Golden Girls feel.  He said, “After looking through a few episodes trying to find establishing shots, it was funny how obvious it was that they used the same production designer as The Golden Girls.  A cheesecake certainly wouldn’t have seemed out of place in that kitchen.”  Certainly not, Michael!

screenshot-001457

screenshot-001454

The property in its original state was utterly charming – in my “opinionation,” at least!  It really is sad, not just for us stalkers but in general, that it has been altered so.

IMG_2236

IMG_2246

So there you have it, the sad saga of the Blossom house and the long quest to track it down!

IMG_2247

IMG_2252

Big THANK YOU to fellow stalker Chris for finding this location and to fellow stalker Michael for helping with the verification process.  Smile

For more stalking fun, follow me on FacebookTwitterInstagramLos Angeles magazine, and Discover Los Angeles.

IMG_2245 -2

Until next time, Happy Stalking!  Smile

Stalk It: The Russo residence from Blossom is located at 3941 Ethel Avenue in Studio City.  It has, sadly, been remodeled beyond recognition.  Drew Barrymore’s childhood home is across the street at 4002 Ethel.

Chelsea Lately’s “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor”

IMG_2270-1

Those of you who are regular visitors to my site will remember that, back in May, my good friend Blaze Foster was hired to be part of a “Detective Lately” skit on the Chelsea Lately show.   His scene was originally scheduled to be filmed on May 8th and I, of course, tagged along with him to the set, where I got to meet Chelsea’s assistant Chuy Bravo and “Staff Homosexual” Guy Branum.    YAY!   As fate would have it, though, Chelsea and crew ended up running out of time that day and Blaze’s segment was shelved.  And while Blaze was devastated over not being able to shoot his scene, I actually considered the whole thing to be a blessing in disguise – as they so often are! – as I had a feeling he would be invited back to do it all over again – with me tagging along!  Which is pretty much exactly what happened!  🙂  Blaze ended up filming his Detective Lately segment just a few weeks later on May 27th, and I, again, accompanied him to the studio.  I have yet to blog about my experiences that day, though, as I wanted to wait until the segment aired on TV, which FINALLY happened this past Thursday night – a full SIX MONTHS after it was actually taped!  So, without further ado, here’s a behind-the-scenes look at the filming of Blaze’s segment, aka “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor”!

IMG_2273

On our first visit to the Chelsea Lately set, Blaze and I spent most of our time in the show’s main green room.  On our second visit, though, we were seated in the studio’s alternate green room, which I could NOT have been more excited about, as that meant that I actually got to see BOTH of the Chelsea Lately green rooms in person!!!!  I mean, just how lucky can one girl get?  🙂

IMG_2272

Chelsea’s second green room looks very much like her first and I, of course, had to take photographs of EVERYTHING, including the door, which had Twilight actor Peter Facinelli’s name written on it as he was the last actor to hang out there pre-show,

IMG_2267

IMG_2266

the modern-style couches and coffee tables, which hold several entertainment magazines for actors to peruse while they wait to go on camera,

IMG_2271

the ubiquitous make-up chair,

IMG_2269

and a large television set. I was actually most excited about the TV because an episode of Chelsea was being taped when we arrived at the studio and, thanks to a live feed, we were able to watch it as it was being filmed.  LOVE IT!  The guest that day was former Blossom star  Mayim Bialik, but unfortunately we didn’t spot her at all while we were on the set.  🙁

ScreenShot2716

Pretty much immediately after that day’s episode was finished being taped, Blaze was called into the studio.  I, unfortunately, was not allowed to watch the filming and had to stay behind in the green room.  Thankfully, though, the green room was situated just a few feet away from the Detective Lately set and I could hear almost everything as it happened.  🙂   Blaze was informed prior to the taping that the original mystery idea he had pitched – “Why Isn’t My Agent Getting Me Any Auditions?” – had been changed to “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor” LOL LOL LOL, in which Blaze would be hiring Chelsea to investigate his acting teacher to see if she was defrauding him.  No script had been written for the segment and, although I am fairly certain that Chelsea and the writers had created a brief outline of what they wanted to occur during the scene, for the most part the whole thing was improvised.  Blaze’s only instruction prior to filming was to play things straight and not to try to be funny.  Because Chelsea is the star of the show, they didn’t want Blaze pulling focus away from her.  Which strikes me as absolutely HILARIOUS because if anyone is going to steal the spotlight in a scene, it’s Blaze!  I’ve been in acting class with the guy for over a year now and, let me tell you, pulling focus is just something he does.  Blaze is very flamboyant, very hyper, very funny, and attention is just drawn to him naturally.  So, they really couldn’t have picked a worse man for the job in this particular case!!!!  I can’t tell you the number of times I heard the producer tell him to “Stop being funny!” during the filming.  🙂   I also heard the direction “Blaze, stop laughing!” on quite a few occasions.  🙂  Blaze said that Chelsea was absolutely HILARIOUS during the scene and that he had a very hard time keeping a straight face while filming with her.

ScreenShot2722

ScreenShot2721

ScreenShot2723

The entire segment only took about 90 minutes to shoot.  Because I had a sinking feeling that I wouldn’t be able to meet Chelsea while there, I was really hoping that Blaze would be able to pose for a photo with her after the taping had been completed.   Amazingly enough, though, outside of the actual filming of the scene, Blaze had absolutely no interaction with Chelsea whatsoever!   When he was initially brought onto the set, Chelsea was not yet there.  The first time Blaze actually saw her was when she walked into the detective office at the top of the scene, after the cameras had already started rolling.  She also left the set before filming had been completed.   As soon as producers thought they had gotten enough footage of Chelsea, she was rushed off the stage and Blaze didn’t even get a chance to say thank you or shake her hand.  After she left, Blaze had to stay behind to shoot some brief close-ups of him saying “Yes” and “No” to Chelsea’s empty chair.   LOL   Such a bummer, as I had so wanted a photograph of the two of them.  🙁  Randomly enough, though, Chelsea did poke her head into the green room to say “Hi” to me as she walked by on her way off the set.  🙂  It was a very quick exchange, but I was SUPER excited nonetheless.

Blaze’s skit, which you can watch above, was absolutely hilarious.  I was really impressed with the amount of screen time he got, too.  The only thing I was really disappointed about was the fact that my favorite line ended up on the cutting room floor.  🙁  At one point during the scene Chelsea asks Blaze, “What do you think, you’re some sort of Tony Danza?” to which Blaze says nothing.  In reality, though, when Chelsea asked Blaze that question during the filming, he responded with, “Who’s Tony Danza?”, to which she said, “You know GOD DAMN WELL who Tony Danza is!”  LOL LOL LOL  I literally could not stop laughing when I heard her say that during the filming and was extremely impressed at how well she and Blaze played off of each other while improvising.  I am not a person who thinks well on her feet, so I am always in awe of people who have the ability to be funny off the cuff like that.  That’s why I was completely shocked when I saw the finished product and realized it was lacking Blaze and Chelsea’s little Tony Danza exchange.  🙁  I am guessing the reasoning behind the cut had to do with the fact that producers wanted Chelsea to be the one delivering the funny lines, so even though her line trumped Blaze’s, they just decided to cut out the entire segment.  Such a bummer.  Otherwise though, “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor” skit was great!  And, for those who are wondering, everything Blaze said in the scene was true – he is 24 years old, he really did play a bad guy in The Brave One, and he also played a drug dealer in a commercial starring Carmen Electra.

ScreenShot2720

On a side note – When my fiancé I watched “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor” this past Thursday night, one of the first things out of his mouth was, “How did Chelsea come up with the idea of making Blaze’s hair stick straight up like that?”  Well, I just about fell off my chair laughing at his question because, in actuality, the There’s Something About Mary style ‘do just happened to be how Blaze was wearing his hair at that time.  The guy is nothing if not flamboyant!  🙂  I can only imagine what Chelsea was thinking when she walked onto the set and saw Blaze – and his hair – for the first time.  I’m surprised she didn’t bow down right then and there and start thanking God for bringing in an actor who had so much, er, material for her to work with.  🙂

[ad]

Until next time, Happy Stalking!  🙂

Stalk It: Chelsea Lately is filmed at the Digital Media Center, which is located at 12312 West Olympic Boulevard in Los Angeles.  You can get tickets to watch a live taping here.  If you don’t live in the area, you can still catch Chelsea weeknights at 11 p.m. on E!  And you can watch Blaze’s skit, “The Case of the Douche Bag Actor”, here.